bjkl;l;nkDollars & Sense Quarterly Newsletter for MedAmerica Financial Services, Inc.
April 2002

Skating continued...  
 
In This Issue

Welcome to the Figure Skating World of Investment Analysts
Whose side are Investment Analyst’s on anyway?

Investment Alert
Navellier on the “FundWatch” list.

Select an Investment Strategy
Sample portfolios that you may wish to use as a guide to investing.

And the Survey Says...
Results of MFSI Survey

Points to Ponder
Benefit details.

Investment
Performance

Quarterly update.

 

You feel like the skater who just ended up in 13th place despite doing everything correctly. Please remember, investment analysts, and especially brokerage house analysts, declare their allegiance to the company they work for. They are not necessarily independent.

According to First Call, “In 2000, there were 28,000 recommendations by brokerage-house analysts. As of the start of October 2000, 99.1% of those recommendations on U.S. companies were either “strong buy”, “buy”, or “hold.” Just 0.9% of the time, analysts said “sell.” Less than 1% sell orders? That’s scarier than Roseanne Barr in a tutu!

Many brokerage houses engage in multiple investment activities. However, the
primary source of conflict for many investment analysts occurs when the investment banking department is underwriting stock or bond issues of a corporate client. Investment banking provides huge fees to a brokerage house and there is extreme pressure on the analysts to recommend a client’s stock even when the underlying fundamentals may not support that recommendation. In fact, in a report done by Kent Womack of Dartmouth College, “Stocks that underwriter analysts recommend perform more poorly than “buy” recommendations by unaffiliated brokers prior to, at the time of, and subsequent to the recommendation date. The results suggest a potential conflict of interest inherent in the different functions that investment bankers perform.”

The SEC has proposed that relationships like this be disclosed anytime an analyst issues an opinion or report but to date, these rules have not been adopted. So what can you do to determine whether a stock is worth buying or selling?

  • Before you invest in a stock, determine the amount to invest and when you might need that money in the future. For instance, if this money is for a new sailboat in five years, determine whether the potential investment is too risky or too conservative to meet that goal.
  • Validate an analyst’s recommendation by determining what relationship the analyst’s firm has with the underlying stock. Check the stock’s 10K annual report or the 10Q quarterly report to determine whether his brokerage house sponsor is involved in some advisory capacity.

  • Compare an analyst’s recommenda tion to other analyst’s. With 99% buy
    recommendations, however, this is obviously not fool proof.

  • Read several independent analyst’s recommendations and compare their remarks on the stock’s future prospects, market size, cash flow, the growth potential of the underlying industry, future innovations, and the health of their financial statements to see if the stock is worth an investment. Note potential pitfalls of the stock. For example, if the company has one major client that accounts for 35% of revenue, what are the chances of losing this client?

    If you’re a novice investor, reduce the reliance on one analyst’s opinion by
    diversifying with mutual funds. Mutual fund managers provide a good second opinion to investment analyst recommendations. Of course, mutual funds are generally less risky than individual stocks and often are ideal for portfolios with longer term horizons.

    If you follow the stock market closely, the first four points, while tough to do, can prevent those groans of resignation one year later when you say “Why did I invest in that stock?” They are not foolproof guidelines by any means, but if you study an underlying stock, you should be able to react to environmental factors that might affect its future performance. Above all, try to stay disciplined in your investment approach and don’t listen to just anyone with regard to your investments.
    So beware of analysts touting stocks with “strong buys”. They, like figure skating judges, might be preying on your emotions and padding their wallets. If you ever see an investment analyst having lunch with a figure skating judge, see if they’ll buy you dessert.

    Remember, the above figure skating diatribe does not reflect the opinions of MedAmerica Financial Services, its clients, or Dick Button. Any
    objections to this article should be directed to Chris Renner at
    (800) 842-2808.